US Military Assets Near Iran: USS Abraham Lincoln, Gerald R. Ford and Growing Middle East Tensions
Washington Expands Naval Presence as Iran Signals Warning During Nuclear Negotiations in Switzerland

The U.S. aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln is currently positioned near Iran. It is worth noting that Washington has been increasing pressure on Iran over its nuclear program and its bloody crackdown on recent protests, even as negotiations continue.
Meanwhile, U.S. and Iranian officials are set to begin a second round of talks in Switzerland on Tuesday. Iran has stated that the meeting in Switzerland will focus on its nuclear program and the possible lifting of U.S. economic sanctions, while Washington has indicated it wants to raise additional issues during the negotiations.
The Abraham Lincoln is accompanied by three guided missile destroyers, 90 aircraft including F-35 fighter jets, and 5,680 personnel. Although the carrier was deployed to the Gulf region at the end of January, it had not appeared in satellite imagery until now.
According to the latest information, the vessel is currently near the coast of Oman, approximately 700 kilometers from Iran.
Reports also indicate that the United States has dispatched the world’s largest warship, the USS Gerald R. Ford, toward the Middle East, where it could arrive within the next three weeks.
The presence of the Abraham Lincoln further underscores that the U.S. has increased its military footprint in the Middle East in recent weeks. There has been a notable rise in the number of American destroyers, warships, and fighter jets in the region.
What military assets has the U.S. moved to the Middle East?
Publicly available images from the European Sentinel-2 satellite show the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea, currently about 150 miles (240 kilometers) off the coast of Oman.
The carrier had not been visible in satellite images after entering the region in January because it was operating in open waters where satellite coverage is limited. Unlike land-based military assets, which are often clearly visible in satellite imagery, naval vessels are harder to track in open seas.
This latest development means that satellite imagery has now identified up to 12 U.S. warships in the Middle East, including the Abraham Lincoln, a nuclear-powered Nimitz-class carrier that forms a carrier strike group with three destroyers.
Additionally, two long-range missile-capable destroyers and three specialized combat ships designed for littoral operations are currently stationed at the naval base in Bahrain.
Two more destroyers have been spotted in the eastern Mediterranean near the U.S. base at Souda Bay, while another vessel is present in the Red Sea.
At Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, the number of F-15 and EA-18 fighter jets has increased.
There has also been a rise in cargo aircraft, refueling planes, and communications aircraft arriving in the Middle East from the U.S. and Europe.
How is Iran responding?
On February 6, U.S. Central Command released images of the Abraham Lincoln operating in the Arabian Sea alongside destroyers, fighter jets, surveillance aircraft, and Coast Guard vessels.
The move appeared to be a display of American military strength, and Iran responded accordingly.
On Monday (February 16), Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched naval exercises in the Strait of Hormuz. During the drills, IRGC Commander-in-Chief Major General Mohammad Pakpour was seen inspecting naval vessels at a port, after which missiles were fired from one of the ships. These scenes were reported by the IRGC-affiliated Iranian news agency Tasnim.
The Strait of Hormuz is considered one of the world’s most vital commercial waterways and a key route for global oil shipments. One-fifth of the world’s oil and gas passes through this strait. Tasnim’s report showed the Iranian commander flying by helicopter and observing the exercises.
Expert opinion on U.S. military preparations
Military intelligence expert Justin Crump said the current U.S. military preparations in the Middle East show “greater depth” and differ from preparations made before the arrest of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026 or before last June’s airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
In all those U.S. military actions, a carrier strike group and several destroyers were involved, but assets were deployed under very different circumstances in Venezuela and Iran.
Before operations against Venezuela, the U.S. had deployed the Gerald R. Ford to the Caribbean, where eight other warships were already present. However, fewer aircraft were used at that time because fighter jets could easily be dispatched from U.S. mainland bases or from Puerto Rico if necessary.
The U.S. had also deployed amphibious assault ships in the Caribbean, which served as helicopter launch platforms, as seen during Maduro’s arrest.
However, Venezuela’s military is generally considered weak and lacks the capacity to mount effective defense or retaliation against the United States.
Last year, when the U.S. carried out Operation Midnight Hammer targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, it was striking a country with a far more capable military than Venezuela’s.
It should be noted that Iran has the capability to target U.S. bases across the Middle East.
During Midnight Hammer, the U.S. deployed two carrier strike groups in the region, five destroyers in the Mediterranean and Red Sea, and three warships in the Gulf.
It also moved squadrons of fighter jets and refueling aircraft from the U.S. to Europe. However, the B-2 stealth bombers that struck Iran’s nuclear facilities at Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were launched from bases in Missouri.
Justin Crump, CEO of the risk and intelligence firm Sibylline, said the presence of U.S. warships and aircraft, along with eight air bases in the region, gives the U.S. the capacity to conduct around 800 missions per day to render any Iranian retaliation “ineffective.”
He added that what is currently being observed is not merely preparation for an attack but a broader defensive deployment that can be scaled up or down depending on circumstances. Compared with Venezuela or last year’s Operation Midnight Hammer, this posture has greater depth and sustainability. It is designed to neutralize any potential Iranian response and to defend U.S. assets in the region as well as Israel.



Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.