Families logo

The Power of Presence

Why Parenting That Feels Good Is Not the Same as Parenting That Works

By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST PodcastPublished about 4 hours ago 4 min read

When “Good Parenting” Became a Feeling

In modern parenting conversations, “good” has increasingly come to mean emotionally warm, verbally affirming, and immediately comforting. A good parent is expected to soothe distress quickly, validate feelings consistently, and minimize discomfort whenever possible. These traits are treated as obvious indicators of healthy parenting, reinforced by cultural messaging, therapeutic language, and social reward structures. When a child feels better in the moment, the parenting decision is assumed to have been correct, and when discomfort persists, the decision is often framed as a failure of care rather than a necessary part of development.

Yet long-term outcomes consistently tell a different story. Across education, behavior, emotional regulation, and life stability, children benefit far more from presence, structure, and enforced boundaries than from emotional softness alone. The uncomfortable truth is that parenting which feels good in the moment does not reliably produce adults who function well in the long run. Emotional comfort regulates experience, but structure shapes development. When those two aims conflict, development always matters more than immediate relief.

Comfort Measures Experience, Not Capacity

Emotional comfort is immediate, visible, and rewarding. A child cries, a parent soothes, tension dissolves, and the household returns to calm. This creates a fast feedback loop that feels like success because relief is tangible and conflict disappears. Over time, this conditions parents to equate emotional resolution with effective parenting, even when no durable skill or internal capacity has been built in the child.

Parenting success, however, is not measured by emotional resolution in the present. It is measured by competence in the future. Traits such as resilience, delayed gratification, emotional regulation under stress, accountability, and perseverance are not produced by comfort. They are produced by structure that persists even when it introduces friction. A child shielded from discomfort learns avoidance. A child guided through discomfort learns mastery. Confusing these two outcomes is one of the foundational errors in contemporary parenting philosophy.

Presence as Structure, Not Sentiment

Presence is often misunderstood as emotional availability or constant engagement. In reality, presence is the sustained availability of authority that does not disappear under stress. A present parent remains predictable when emotions escalate, enforces rules even when it causes conflict, and does not retreat when enforcement becomes uncomfortable. This kind of presence is not sentimental, but it is deeply formative.

Children do not internalize what comforts them temporarily. They internalize what remains stable over time. Consistent authority teaches children that the world is intelligible, that expectations are real, and that actions have consequences independent of emotional intensity. This reliability is often misread as emotional distance, when it is actually the foundation of security. Emotional warmth may soften an experience, but presence anchored in structure shapes a person.

How Comfort-First Parenting Undermines Authority

When comfort becomes the primary metric for good parenting, boundaries weaken almost automatically. Rules become negotiable, authority becomes reactive, and enforcement is delayed or avoided to preserve emotional harmony. Children are exceptionally perceptive in these environments. They learn quickly which emotions produce concessions and which behaviors cause adults to retreat.

The result is not emotional health, but emotional leverage. Discipline begins to feel cruel because it disrupts peace, and structure begins to feel harsh because it introduces limits. Over time, parents may avoid enforcement not out of neglect, but out of a desire to preserve closeness. The cost is that children learn to regulate their environment rather than themselves. Short-term harmony is maintained, but long-term stability erodes.

Why Order Creates Freedom

Order is frequently framed as restrictive or authoritarian, but this framing misunderstands how development works. Clear boundaries reduce anxiety because expectations are known. Predictable consequences reduce chaos because outcomes are stable. Consistent authority reduces emotional volatility because rules do not change based on mood, negotiation, or fatigue.

Freedom does not emerge from unlimited choice. It emerges from competence. Competence requires standards. Standards require enforcement. Enforcement requires authority that does not depend on emotional approval. Children raised within structure often display greater confidence and emotional security precisely because they are not required to manage adult uncertainty or renegotiate the rules of reality.

The Measure That Only Appears Later

Parenting does not end in childhood, and its success cannot be evaluated during childhood alone. Its real results surface years later. The relevant question is not whether a child felt comforted at eight, but whether they can function at twenty-eight. Can they regulate emotion under pressure, accept limits without collapse, sustain effort when conditions are unfair, and take responsibility when things go wrong.

These capacities are not cultivated through comfort. They are cultivated through structure sustained over time by a present authority figure willing to be disliked when necessary. Parenting that avoids conflict may feel compassionate in the short term, but it often leaves children unprepared for a world that does not negotiate its demands.

Why Parenting That Works Rarely Feels Gentle

Modern culture has collapsed parenting into emotional experience, treating comfort as the primary indicator of success. But experience is not outcome. Feeling good is transient. Becoming capable is permanent.

Presence paired with order produces adults who can withstand discomfort, navigate responsibility, and build stable lives. Comfort without structure produces dependency, volatility, and fragility. Parenting that works does not always feel good in the moment, but it works where it counts. The true measure of good parenting is not how gently childhood passes, but how well adulthood is lived.

adoptionadviceartbook reviewscelebritieschildrendivorceddiyextended familyfact or fictionfeaturefostergrandparentsgriefHolidayhow tohumanityimmediate familyinterviewlgbtqlistliteraturemarriedmovie reviewparentspop culturepregnancyproduct reviewsatiresiblingssinglesocial mediatraveltv reviewvaluesvintage

About the Creator

Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast

Peter unites intellect, wisdom, curiosity, and empathy —

Writing at the crossroads of faith, philosophy, and freedom —

Confronting confusion with clarity —

Guiding readers toward courage, conviction, and renewal —

With love, grace, and truth.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.