Amy Rose was the first Time-Travel Hedgehog
Ladies first, sorry Silver...but you are still the man!
When you think of time travel in the Sonic the Hedgehog lore, who is the first that pops into your head? I thought it was Silver the Hedgehog, just like several other people. But guess what? Amy Rose did take part in time travel, and so did Metal Sonic.
I bring this up because there is talk about the Sonic 4 movie that Amy Rose came from a ruined future. This topic was explained by YouTuber: Tyrecordslol.
Check out the link included. In the game Sonic CD, in Sonic’s world, there is a lake called the Never Lake, and above it hovers a Little Planet, which appears in the last month of every year. This is no ordinary small planet; it is called a miracle planet because it has been known to carry the time stones.
The time stones allow the user to travel anywhere in any time and allows it to change history basically these stones have been known to defy time and you can guess who wants to get a hold of these stones, that’s right Robotnik which is why he creates the mechanical doppelganger metal Sonic
he does this to keep Sonic occupied while he steals the stones, but here's something tricky metal Sonic wants to be the original, not a copy, which is why he agrees to follow his master. Thankfully, Sonic won't be alone because here's where Amy Rose comes in. From what Tyrecordslol said in his video, Robotnik takes over and alters the timeline so badly that Amy travels through time to find Sonic for help. Hence, in the end credits, Amy travels through time because in her timeline, Robotnik and Metal Sonic took over. All I can say is I'm really looking forward to it, not just for the continuation of Sonic the Hedgehog's story, but because, like in the game Shadow the Hedgehog,
Shadow does not die; in fact, there's another end credit that shows he survived. Looks like the ultimate life form gets a second chance to prove how amazing he is.
But then, here's one thing I do wonder: now that Amy has appeared and we see the time stones, does this mean this will slowly introduce my absolute second-favorite hedgehog, Silver? Because if we all know from the Sonic video games called Sonic the Hedgehog 2006, the entity that ruins the future is Iblis, and it's Robotnik that releases him, accidently, for those of you who haven't played the game I'll be sure to include the link that shows that the true iblis trigger was not Sonic, but, robotic and Mephiles the dark was the one that tricked Silver the hedgehog.
Basically, this little f**ker was a villain in disguise and wanted to became stronger by uniting with Iblis and becoming Solaris. However, this concerns me because the flames of disaster were done by Knuckles the Echidna himself in the TV show spinoff called Knuckles the Echidna that was on Netflix. I'll include the link to the episode.
so you all can check it out, I just want to be clear I am not a gamer, so, it's best to do the research so I can try to understand the game, because there's so much differences between the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise video games than there is in the films. A good example: Black Doom was not in Sonic 3, and Black Doom is, unfortunately, Shadow's biological father. He was created to help cure Maria from a sickness, but in the film, Maria was healthy. Yet we see Shadow arrive in a meteorite. I'll be sure to include the link to the blog I wrote about this, and I would love to hear your opinion on it.
One last thing if I may request, can there be bloopers at the end of the film, not just with the actors but with the characters Sonic, Knuckles, Tails, Shadow, and everyone else not as puppets but like the live action characters acting with the actors, for example, like they did in Pixar's A Bug's Life end credits bloopers. It would be so cool. And not only would the kids love it, but the grown-ups would, too.
About the Creator
stephanie borges
I've been writing off and on for years; I write short stories, scripts, and blogs. I can't think of anything more relaxing than writing. I also do graphic design.
Keep reading
More stories from stephanie borges and writers in Geeks and other communities.
Which Sonic Character has the saddest backstory?
I recently watched a video by YouTuber Tyrecordslol discussing how many fans believe Shadow the Hedgehog has the saddest backstory in the Sonic franchise. While I understand why Shadow’s story resonates with so many, I actually think there are two characters who could rival him: Knuckles and Silver the Hedgehog.
By stephanie borgesabout 19 hours ago in Geeks
Goodbye, Mr. Duvall
It is turning out to be an interesting year. I was in the middle of teaching a class when a pop-up appeared on the screen announcing the death of Mr. Robert Seldon Duvall (yes, that was his full name). I was in the middle of a discussion on the obsession we have with winning when it comes to sports (the Winter Olympics was a theme), and I felt as though things were coming full circle. We had already lost Gene Hackman last year, and along with that titan, it feels though one particular golden age has closed off to be replaced by...?
By Kendall Defoe a day ago in Geeks
Emerald Fennell Defends Her Changes to Wuthering Heights: “You’ve Got to Make Those Hard Decisions”
Director and screenwriter Emerald Fennell has defended her creative choices in adapting the literary classic Wuthering Heights, arguing that modern film audiences require bold interpretation rather than strict loyalty to the original text. Fennell, known for her distinctive visual style and emotionally complex storytelling, has faced growing criticism from literary purists after early details emerged about her forthcoming film version of the 1847 novel. Changes to character structure, dialogue, and narrative focus have prompted debate about whether the adaptation strays too far from Emily Brontë’s dark and tragic romance. Speaking in a recent interview, Fennell said that adapting a revered novel comes with inevitable controversy. “You’ve got to make those hard decisions,” she explained. “Film is a different language. What works on the page doesn’t always work on screen, and if you want the story to live again, you have to reimagine it.” A Bold New Interpretation According to production insiders, Fennell’s version of Wuthering Heights places greater emphasis on psychological trauma and power dynamics between the central characters, rather than the traditional gothic romance tone. Some scenes have reportedly been condensed or restructured, and certain minor characters have been removed altogether. The director has also shifted narrative perspective, focusing more closely on the inner world of Catherine Earnshaw rather than relying on the layered storytelling framework of the novel, which uses multiple narrators. Fennell said this decision was essential to connect with contemporary viewers. “The novel is incredibly modern in its emotional violence,” she said. “But the way it’s told is distant and formal. I wanted to bring the audience right inside the characters’ minds — to feel their rage, obsession, and grief in a visceral way.” Critics and Fans Divided Reaction to the changes has been sharply divided. Some literary scholars argue that altering the structure risks losing the unique voice of Emily Brontë’s original work. “This is a novel built on storytelling within storytelling,” said one university literature professor. “Removing that framework may simplify the plot, but it also strips away its moral complexity.” Fans on social media have also voiced concern, particularly over rumors that certain iconic scenes have been modernized or shortened. However, others welcome the director’s willingness to take risks. “Every generation needs its own Wuthering Heights,” wrote one film critic. “If we keep remaking it exactly the same way, it becomes a museum piece instead of a living story.” The Pressure of a Classic Fennell acknowledged that adapting one of the most studied novels in English literature brings enormous pressure. “You’re standing on the shoulders of a giant,” she said. “But you’re also responsible for creating something that stands on its own. Otherwise, why make the film at all?” She compared her approach to past reinterpretations of Shakespeare and Jane Austen, arguing that fidelity to emotional truth matters more than literal accuracy. “The spirit of the book is about obsession, cruelty, and love that destroys people,” she said. “That’s what I’ve protected. The rest is scaffolding.” Casting and Visual Style The production has drawn attention for its unconventional casting choices and stark visual design. Fennell has reportedly chosen a darker, more minimalist aesthetic than previous adaptations, with bleak landscapes and intimate close-ups replacing the sweeping romantic imagery traditionally associated with the story. Sources close to the project say the film will highlight class conflict and emotional isolation, themes Fennell believes resonate strongly in today’s society. “This is a story about outsiders,” she noted. “About what happens when people are denied dignity and belonging. That feels painfully current.” A Broader Debate About Adaptation The controversy reflects a wider debate in the film industry about how much freedom directors should take when adapting literary classics. In recent years, filmmakers have increasingly reworked famous novels to reflect modern values and perspectives, sometimes provoking backlash from traditionalists. Film historian Mark Reynolds said Fennell’s defense highlights the tension between preservation and innovation. “Some viewers want historical authenticity; others want relevance,” he said. “Both are valid. The challenge is finding a balance that honors the original while speaking to a new generation.” Looking Ahead Despite the criticism, studio executives remain confident in the project, pointing to Fennell’s previous successes and her reputation for fearless storytelling. The film is scheduled for release next year and is already expected to spark intense discussion upon its debut at major film festivals. Fennell says she welcomes debate. “If people argue about it, that means they care,” she said. “That’s a good thing. Emily Brontë wrote a story that refuses to be quiet. I hope this film does the same.” As anticipation grows, the director stands firm in her belief that adaptation is an act of interpretation, not imitation. “You can’t please everyone,” she added. “But you can be honest to the story you’re telling. And sometimes that means changing things.” Whether audiences embrace her vision or reject it, Fennell’s Wuthering Heights is already proving that classic literature still has the power to provoke passion nearly two centuries after it was first published.
By Fiaz Ahmed 4 days ago in Geeks
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.