China Exit Strategy — Apple vs. Samsung

In the grand chessboard of global business, tech giants Samsung and Apple are deploying their pieces with calculated precision, plotting a course away from China towards Southeast Asia. This transition, marked by strategic decisions and influential undertones, holds vast implications for the global supply chain of the future.

Samsung’s Groundbreaking Move to Vietnam

Samsung took a bold step in 2008, establishing a manufacturing foothold in Vietnam’s Bac Ninh region. This move, hailed as visionary, led to significant returns. Samsung insulated itself from increasing labour costs, geopolitical issues, and disruptions in the supply chain — benefits that have shaped its growth trajectory.

Over the next ten years, Samsung’s systematic shift away from China delivered a robust competitive advantage. Navigating around tariffs on Chinese goods and soaring labour costs, the company expanded internationally. Samsung now produces half its smartphones in Vietnam and between 20 to 30% in India, demonstrating the substantial shift in its manufacturing strategy.

Apple’s Strategic Detour Amidst Global Disruptions

As the global pandemic continues to impact businesses and economies around the world, technology giants such as Apple have taken decisive measures to fortify their supply chain dependencies. Echoing a strategic move initially implemented by their industry rival Samsung, Apple has broadened its production footprint. Key to this diversification has been ramping up operations in Vietnam, a rising powerhouse in the electronics manufacturing sector. As some of the Apple Watch and Mac production lines have already been established there. This strategic expansion has been instrumental in building a more robust supply chain, better equipped to navigate the unpredictable landscape posed by global crises.

Apple has also significantly amplified its presence in India, a burgeoning market known for its high potential and vast workforce. This move not only provides an alternative production base but also allows Apple to tap into India’s rapidly growing consumer market. The twin strategy of broadening production bases and targeting emergent markets forms the core of Apple’s adaptive response to the pandemic.

Along with the recent disruptive protests at Foxconn’s Zhengzhou iPhone factory and Apple’s key Guangzhou manufacturing plant. These incident have heightened Apple’s urgency for supply chain diversification, leading to significant production hurdles and revealing vulnerabilities of dependence on a single manufacturing hub. As workers’ grievances and COVID-19 restrictions challenge operations, it’s expected that continued issues could impact Apple’s output significantly during the period of restriction. Amidst these adversities, Apple has initiated a pivotal transition strategy, underscoring the need for decentralised production to mitigate risks and ensure resilience.

India and Vietnam: A Common Solution for Both Parties

Indeed, the tech manufacturing sectors in India and Vietnam have been witnessing rapid growth, largely due to their favourable conditions. For instance, both nations offer lower labour costs compared to traditional manufacturing hubs like China. These cost advantages have been key drivers attracting tech giants like Apple and Samsung to set up manufacturing units in these nations. Additionally, the government in both countries has put forth various incentives, such as tax breaks and subsidies, to promote foreign investments and develop their domestic tech sectors.

Moreover, Apple and Samsung’s strategic decision to expand operations in these countries is aimed at diversifying their supply chains and reducing overreliance on any single market. With geopolitical tensions and global supply chain disruptions, the move seems even more pertinent. Further, expanding operations in India and Vietnam allows these companies to better penetrate the respective domestic markets, tapping into the vast consumer bases that these countries offer. This dynamic shift towards India and Vietnam signifies the emergence of these nations as critical players in the global tech manufacturing landscape, reshaping the future trajectory of the industry.

Exit Challenges

Apple and Samsung have been diversifying their supply chains away from China in recent years, but both companies still rely on certain supplies from the country. This illustrates the complexity of achieving supply chain diversification.

There are a number of factors that make it difficult to diversify supply chains. First, many components are only produced in China, so companies may have no choice but to rely on Chinese suppliers. Second, even if there are alternative suppliers in other countries, they may not be able to meet the same quality or volume requirements. Third, diversifying supply chains can be expensive, as companies need to invest in new manufacturing facilities and relationships.

Despite the challenges, there are a number of reasons why companies are moving to diversify their supply chains. One reason is to reduce risk. By spreading their operations across multiple countries, companies can reduce their exposure to any one market.

Another reason for supply chain diversification is to improve efficiency. By manufacturing products closer to their markets, companies can reduce transportation costs and lead times. This can make their products more competitive and improve customer satisfaction.

The shift to a more diversified supply chain is a complex and ongoing process. However, it is one that is essential for companies that want to reduce risk and improve efficiency.

Yet, one can’t help but wonder what the ripple effects of this monumental shift will be. While the future remains uncertain, the burgeoning tech ecosystems in Vietnam and India suggest a new global order.

🇨🇳👋📱

=== === === === === === === === === === === === === ===

Attention to Detail

A comment from @Bonkkered | Apple vs. Samsung’s Strategies to Move Manufacturing Away From China | WSJ

Embracing a forward-thinking perspective, diversifying production sites is viewed as a proactive strategy. However, it is imperative to maintain affordable prices and mitigate potential inflation risks.