extraterrestrial
Speculation, theory, UFOs and Aliens. Are we alone in this universe or is there life outside Earth?
Lockheed: “We’re Redefining Security. Foreign, Domestic and Extra Terrestrial.”
We just heard from the Department of Defense regarding their national space policy . In it, they made no mention of defending the US against extra terrestrial threats. That certainly isn't a surprise. What is a surprise though is that Lockheed immediately comes out with an
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
National Defense Strategy: Ignore Extra Terrestrials
The title of the 2018 National Defense Strategy—“Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge”—pretty much sums up the tone that has been set by Secretary Jim Mattis. (Article)Note what happens when we use wormation to read his name under EARTH Methodology to see if it fits into the ETA and generates those repeating patterns that provide a preponderance of evidence.
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
Extra Terrestrial Rule of One
When you're trying to solve the ET and UFO phenomenon , it can be extremely difficult to find people you can have an intellectual conversation with. Most people are not well informed on the subject matter. Add to that the position society takes that it is basically a delusional disorder or schizophrenic break from reality and you find yourself in conversations that border on useless.
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
Top 3 Reasons We Can't Find Extra Terrestrials
We are using the wrong terminology: The single most recognized term in the search for Extra Terrestrials is ET. The problem is that it requires us to basically be able to interact with another planet outside of our solar system. At best we are only going to be able to get information from it that is stale at best. Even in a best-case scenario the closest star system is over four light years away so any information from it would be at least four years old unless we learn how to travel at speeds greater than
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
Extra Terrestrial Architecture War Theory Hypothesis
In the arduous search for ETI , the possibility of Hetlau increasingly becomes the predominant theory put forth to explain what is really going on. The problem starts to arise that in order for society to discuss the topic as plausible, the vast majority immediately call for proof or reply "prove it". It seems so implausible to them that without corroboration it is dismissed as something between wild speculation and a delusional disorder.
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
Coincidence or Extra Terrestrial Coordinated Incidents
One of the most difficult concepts for an EA to overcome in the process of trying to understand ETI is the concept of a coincidence. EA are taught from an early age that whenever an event occurs that seems to be a remarkable concurrence of events without apparent causal connection all you have to do is attribute it to a coincidence and that will explain it. Is that really what is happening though? If you read the word COINCIDENCE with ETI using porphemes it says COordinated INCIDENts. So is it possible that the events on Earth are scripted and not just random?Unfortunately, the hypothesis that is being proposed, namely, the possibility Hetlauare using an ET architecture, requires corroboration for most people to view it as fact. Obviously, the soonest that could possibly happen would be if there was disclosure. For most individuals, it is just too far fetched to believe. For some though, the interest in analyzing incidents that appear to be coordinated so that they can look for repeating patterns that will possibly produce a preponderance of evidence, is worth investing the time in. One of the best arguments people give for claiming the stories surrounding Area 51 about ET and UFOs are false, is that the base is used to develop top-secret state of the art Earthling designed aircraft. The interesting thing about that statement you never hear anyone make a case for is, if that is true, then why was the XB-70 Valkyrie not developed and kept a secret there? The Valkyrie had a far more sophisticated wing using a completely new technology called compression lift. A cockpit that was more advanced in that it allowed the crew to operate it with no spacesuit at altitude, unlike the SR-71. Its speed was equal to the SR-71 so it had as much if not more reason to be kept secret. Yet the exact opposite was done with it. It was tested right out in front of public view. Was a this just a coincidence?As with other events, it is interesting to pose the hypothesis that the possibility Hetlau have scripted the events on Earth. Then reading the information with ETI that occurs around those events yields evidence that shows a repeating pattern. Although this is not corroboration and thus make it factual, it does over time when enough events are viewed, provide a preponderance of evidence that makes it difficult to say continuously "it's just a coincidence." To start with the name of the aircraft:VALKYRIE = RIVAL KEY (enagram)This is interesting because when you evaluate the aircraft as a rival it is key to what is going on. Rival in the sense EA and ESH are rivals. Rival in the sense EA aircraft and Volutes are rivals.First, by comparing the advanced technology of the wing, similar to the advanced technology of the F-14 wing, it is key when comparisons are made to the argument Volutes (UFOs) are not flying since they do not use wings. Yet no aeronautical or astronautical engineers ever bring this up.Second, the case for why it wasn't developed in secret but was tested right out in public view. This is key because the project was ended after a test flight crash occurred killing two pilots and injuring a third. The public might not have had access to this if it was tested in secrecy. The vehicle crashed on June EighT, 1966.It collided with an F-104104 = 1 + 0 + 4 = 5 = E = ET (alphanumeric ecronym)Reading the (3) pilots last names using ETI:
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
Do Extra Terrestrials Use Enagrams to Communicate?
On Earth and in the English language, anagrams are a method of putting hidden words in other words by respelling them. The anagram "Listen," which respells into "Silent" is a perfect example of why we need to evaluate anagrams.People on Earth who believe ET exist but can't understand why they are silent, or why we haven't heard from them, are suffering from the possibility that they don't know how to listen for them correctly. So that anagram is a perfect fit for what we are trying to do. In other words, they may actually be hearing them, but because they don't know what to listen for, they simply aren't aware they are hearing them. I'm not talking about radio signals from SETI. I am talking about the possibility you are hearing them speak to you publicly each day as HET, you just think they are EA.If the possibility exists that Hetlau are here, could they be using a language format that relies on ETI to comprehend it? If we put forth a hypothesis that all the languages on Earth were placed here by ESH and they have left clues to reveal that after they provide disclosure, should we be able to locate them? Obviously, that will not provide factual proof, but it may provide a preponderance of evidence that reveals the repeating patterns that more aware people can pick up on.The trick is that we need to elevate our awareness of basic EA anagrams and look at the possibility of using a new form of anagram called an enagram. Using wormation or word formation and porphemes, enagrams are eXtra terrestrial anagrams.So an example of one would be:LATIN= ALIENFirst, we need to realize ET= TE, so you can substitute E for T or T for E.Why does ET= TE? Basically, this is using ETI to comprehend a looser interpretation of communication than the strict rules imposed by English.ET = TE (backwards or reverse)So we can make LATIN become LAEIN.Then, respelling it as an anagram, we get ALIEN.So the additional step we needed to make to convert it and recognize it is what made it an enagram versus an anagram. Essentially, though, any time you are respelling a word to derive an ESH meaning versus an EA meaning, you are using an enagram.The key is, using normal anagrams, we are never going to be able to resolve more complex examples like that that use ETI. So what we are going to do is use the term enagram in order to allow us to decipher more complex language formats. Also, this will help because, when you tell a person that you are using enagrams, they will not know what it means. They will either try to learn how to use them and help bring about disclosure quicker, or they will just say it's not necessary and feel anagrams will suffice. This will allow the people who want to know what is going on and want to bring about disclosure sooner to not be held back. As an example, it is possible all the people who insist on using ET and UFO versus HET, CTV, and Volute are holding back those who are willing to use the new terminology.
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
First Major Volute (UFO) Sighting of 2018
The UFO sighting with the largest number of repostings so far in 2018 is this one . There is even a video which accompanies the article. As with all UFO videos and images, the quality is substandard. Even the image in the header of the page makes you wonder if it is photoshopped. It is getting a lot of attention though and it certainly is a good opportunity to evaluate what is going on.
By Richard Van Steenberg8 years ago in Futurism
