Potent logo
Content warning
This story may contain sensitive material or discuss topics that some readers may find distressing. Reader discretion is advised. The views and opinions expressed in this story are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Vocal.

The War on Kratom: Who’s Really Behind the Backlash?

Uncovering the Truth Behind the Opposition to This Popular Herb

By Choice BotanicalsPublished 11 months ago 4 min read

Understanding Kratom and Its Controversial Status

Kratom is a natural herb from Southeast Asia. People use it for pain relief, anxiety, and energy boosts. Recently, kratom faced a lot of criticism and negative media attention. So, what's behind this sudden backlash? Many argue the herb has significant benefits, yet others insist it carries hidden dangers.

The controversy around kratom isn't new. It intensified over the past decade as popularity soared in the West. Kratom is now under scrutiny from regulators, lawmakers, and health officials. But are their concerns justified, or is there another motive driving this battle?

Big Pharma’s Role in the Kratom Debate

One theory suggests big pharmaceutical companies fuel the kratom backlash. These corporations profit from selling painkillers and antidepressants. Kratom offers a natural, affordable alternative, threatening these profits.

Pharmaceutical companies spend billions lobbying politicians. They aim to maintain their market dominance by limiting alternative treatments like kratom. This lobbying influences regulations and public perception, creating hurdles for kratom advocates and consumers.

Regulatory Agencies and Their Stance

Regulatory bodies such as the FDA and DEA regularly issue warnings about kratom. They highlight potential side effects and question its safety. However, the research these agencies cite often lacks depth and comprehensive clinical trials.

Critics argue that regulatory agencies rely on limited data or anecdotal evidence to discourage kratom use. Advocates say more thorough research would likely demonstrate kratom's safety and effectiveness. So, why do regulators remain hesitant to explore kratom further?

The Media’s Influence on Kratom’s Reputation

Media coverage significantly shapes public perception of kratom. Headlines about kratom overdoses or deaths frequently appear, but often, these stories don't mention other substances involved. The sensationalized stories attract clicks but misrepresent kratom’s actual risks.

Positive stories about kratom users successfully managing chronic pain or addiction are rare. This imbalance skews public opinion against kratom. Readers unfamiliar with kratom may form opinions based solely on negative reporting.

Misconceptions and Misinformation About Kratom

Many misconceptions surround kratom. Some believe it is dangerously addictive, similar to opioids. However, studies indicate that kratom’s addictive potential is significantly lower.

Another misconception is that kratom regularly causes severe side effects. While adverse effects can occur, they are generally mild, like nausea or dizziness, and usually result from misuse or high doses. Responsible use greatly reduces these risks.

Lawmakers and Legislative Action Against Kratom

Several states and cities attempted to ban kratom. Lawmakers often act based on pressure from concerned constituents or misleading information from interest groups. Frequently, legislators lack accurate information and understanding of kratom’s potential benefits.

Efforts to ban kratom typically stem from isolated negative incidents or media reports. Advocates urge lawmakers to consider comprehensive studies and user testimonies before deciding on bans. Yet, misinformation continues to influence legislative decisions negatively.

The Kratom Community’s Advocacy Efforts

Despite the backlash, the kratom community remains resilient. Advocacy groups actively educate the public, lawmakers, and health officials about kratom’s benefits. They share personal success stories, scientific research, and expert opinions.

These advocates organize petitions, rallies, and informational events. Their goal is to shift public perception and encourage fair, research-based legislation. Their efforts highlight the need for balanced dialogue regarding kratom.

The Scientific Community’s Standpoint on Kratom

The scientific community remains divided on kratom. Some researchers see promise in kratom for managing pain, depression, and opioid withdrawal. Preliminary studies indicate kratom’s alkaloids interact positively with certain brain receptors.

Still, other researchers demand caution due to limited long-term studies. The scientific consensus is clear: more thorough, controlled studies are essential to determine kratom’s true risks and benefits. Until then, uncertainty fuels continued controversy.

Economic Implications of Kratom’s Acceptance

Kratom represents significant economic potential. Its popularity supports thousands of jobs, from farming in Southeast Asia to retail shops across the U.S. Banning kratom would negatively affect many small businesses and communities.

Conversely, regulating kratom effectively could boost local economies, create jobs, and generate tax revenue. Balancing regulation and economic growth is crucial, yet overlooked amid current controversies.

What’s the Real Motive Behind the War on Kratom?

Ultimately, the backlash against kratom seems driven by multiple factors. Pharmaceutical profits, regulatory caution, media sensationalism, and misinformation all contribute. Unraveling this complex situation requires clear-headed discussions based on facts, not fear.

The future of kratom remains uncertain. However, as awareness grows, so does the pushback against misinformation. More balanced reporting, research, and advocacy efforts can shift the narrative toward a truthful understanding of kratom’s role in health and wellness.

What will be the Fate of Kratom?

If the big pharma gets their way, it will be banned however it looks like that is not likely to happen. The FDA planned on making it a controlled substance but that idea was squashed quickly due to public backlash.

There is a political aspect to this situation as well. Thousands of people use Kratom to help curb withdrawal symptoms from heroin use. What do you think would happen if all of a sudden, that natural help was no longer there?

Big Pharma would love it. That would mean they would sell a lot more Suboxone and Methadone. It would also be political suicide because of the effect it would have on the war on drugs.

What's the Solution?

The solution is education, continued studies and responsible regulations. Most of the big Kratom providers like Choice Kratom even support Kratom regulation. There are no downsides when it comes to age restrictions, proper labeling and lab-testing.

Alcohol is regulated for everyone's safety. Kratom should be regulated as well.

References

FDA Kratom Advisory

DEA Fact Sheet on Kratom

American Kratom Association Resources

healthmarijuana minute

About the Creator

Choice Botanicals

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.