U.K. Police Consult Criminal Prosecutors About Andrew–Epstein Allegations
Formal / News style: Authorities review new information linked to the late financier as scrutiny of Prince Andrew intensifies. Metropolitan Police assess fresh material to determine whether a criminal investigation can be reopened. Consultations with Crown Prosecution Service follow renewed attention to Epstein-related court documents. Professional & engaging: Fresh evidence prompts British authorities to reconsider past decisions in a high-profile royal scandal. Legal threshold under review as allegations resurface years after initial inquiries were closed. Short & impactful: Royal scandal returns to the spotlight. New scrutiny over old allegations.
British police have confirmed they are consulting with criminal prosecutors regarding allegations linking Prince Andrew to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, renewing public scrutiny over the royal’s past association with the disgraced financier and raising fresh questions about whether criminal charges could be pursued in the United Kingdom.
The Metropolitan Police Service said it is reviewing material and liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to determine whether any new evidence meets the legal threshold for further investigation. The move follows renewed attention to Epstein-related court documents and testimony that have emerged in the United States, prompting British authorities to reassess whether domestic legal action is warranted.
Prince Andrew, the younger brother of King Charles III, has long denied any wrongdoing and has consistently said he has no recollection of meeting Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most prominent accusers. Giuffre has alleged that Epstein trafficked her to Prince Andrew when she was 17, claims that Andrew has rejected as false.
Renewed Review of Evidence
The Metropolitan Police previously closed its inquiry into Prince Andrew in 2022, stating at the time that no further action would be taken after reviewing available evidence. However, officials now say that developments in U.S. civil litigation and the unsealing of additional court documents have led them to reassess whether any material could be relevant under U.K. criminal law.
A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said the force was “aware of reports and is considering information that has been made available,” adding that it is working with prosecutors to determine if the legal criteria for a criminal investigation are met. Under British law, prosecutors must establish that there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction before charges can be considered.
The Crown Prosecution Service declined to comment on the specifics of the consultation but confirmed it routinely provides legal advice to police on complex and high-profile cases.
Background of the Allegations
Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein became a major public controversy after Epstein was arrested in the United States in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. Epstein later died in prison while awaiting trial. His case exposed a network of wealthy and powerful individuals who had social ties to him, triggering global investigations and civil lawsuits.
In 2022, Prince Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in a U.S. civil case, agreeing to pay an undisclosed sum while maintaining his innocence. The settlement did not include an admission of liability, but it effectively ended the civil proceedings against him.
Following that case, Andrew was stripped of his military titles and royal patronages and withdrew from public duties, becoming a largely private figure within the royal family.
Legal and Political Implications
Legal experts say the renewed consultation with prosecutors does not automatically mean charges will follow. Instead, it reflects a procedural step to evaluate whether any newly surfaced information changes the legal position.
“In cases of this sensitivity and public interest, police are obligated to examine whether new material could justify reopening an inquiry,” said one former senior prosecutor. “But the evidentiary bar remains very high, particularly when alleged conduct took place years ago and across international jurisdictions.”
The situation also presents challenges due to jurisdictional issues. Many of the alleged incidents occurred outside the United Kingdom, primarily in the United States and on Epstein’s private properties. Any potential prosecution in Britain would require clear evidence that offenses took place within U.K. legal jurisdiction.
Public Reaction and Royal Impact
The renewed scrutiny has reignited debate in Britain about accountability and transparency within powerful institutions. Advocacy groups for survivors of sexual abuse have welcomed the police review, arguing that all allegations must be examined thoroughly regardless of the status of those involved.
Buckingham Palace has not issued a new statement regarding the latest development, but previously said that Prince Andrew has denied the allegations and is cooperating with legal authorities where appropriate.
The issue remains sensitive for the monarchy, which has sought to distance itself from the scandal. King Charles III has made efforts to modernize the institution and restore public trust following years of controversy involving multiple members of the royal family.
Next Steps
The Metropolitan Police said no timeline has been set for a decision on whether a new investigation will be launched. Any determination will depend on the assessment of evidence and advice from prosecutors.
For now, the consultation process signals that British authorities are taking renewed allegations seriously, even as the legal hurdles remain substantial. The outcome could have significant implications not only for Prince Andrew but also for broader questions of how high-profile individuals are treated under the law.
As international attention continues to focus on Epstein-related revelations, the case underscores the enduring impact of one of the most notorious scandals in recent history and the continuing search for accountability.
About the Creator
Fiaz Ahmed
I am Fiaz Ahmed. I am a passionate writer. I love covering trending topics and breaking news. With a sharp eye for what’s happening around the world, and crafts timely and engaging stories that keep readers informed and updated.
Keep reading
More stories from Fiaz Ahmed and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Don Lemon Hires Federal Prosecutor Who Quit Over Immigration Crackdown
Former CNN anchor and longtime journalist Don Lemon has taken a striking new step in his legal defense by enlisting a veteran federal prosecutor who resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota amid mounting tensions over the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies and handling of high-profile investigations. The move underscores the high stakes of Lemon’s federal case, which has drawn national attention and raised questions about press freedom, prosecutorial discretion and political influence within the Justice Department. Lemon, who now works as an independent journalist, was indicted earlier this year along with eight others for his alleged role in a January 18 protest that disrupted a Sunday service at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Federal prosecutors allege the group conspired to interfere with worship and intimidate congregants, invoking a 1994 civil rights statute typically used to protect access to reproductive health clinics but also applicable to places of worship. Lemon asserts he was present only in his journalistic capacity, livestreaming the event as part of his reporting work. Unexpected Legal Reinforcement In a notable twist, Lemon has added Joseph H. Thompson, a former interim U.S. Attorney for Minnesota, to his defense team. Thompson had served nearly 17 years in the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office and held senior leadership positions, including acting U.S. Attorney, before resigning in January amid internal disagreements over how federal authorities were handling immigration-related cases and certain investigations. A court filing earlier this week confirmed that Thompson will appear as counsel of record for Lemon, joining powerhouse defense attorney Abbe Lowell in representing the journalist in federal court. Lowell is known for representing high-profile clients in politically charged cases and is expected to lead the defense strategy. Thompson’s decision to switch sides — from federal prosecutor to defense counsel — against the very office he once helped lead adds an unusual dynamic to the case. It pits Lemon’s defense team directly against seasoned federal attorneys with whom Thompson once worked, potentially reshaping legal tactics and courtroom dynamics. The Washington Post Why Thompson Resigned Thompson’s departure from the U.S. Attorney’s Office last month came amid a broader wave of resignations by senior prosecutors reportedly frustrated by directives from Justice Department leadership under the Trump administration. Several prosecutors, including Thompson and at least five colleagues, stepped down after disputes over the department’s immigration enforcement strategy and its approach to investigating the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer in Minneapolis. The Guardian Moody ideological differences reportedly emerged after Justice Department leaders overruled more experienced prosecutors who sought to pursue a legal inquiry into the killing of Good. Instead, the department directed focus toward other aspects of related matters, prompting Thompson and others to resign in protest, according to reporting from multiple outlets. The Guardian After leaving the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Thompson partnered with another former federal prosecutor, Harry Jacobs, to establish a private law firm — Thompson Jacobs PLLC — that focuses on complex litigation, white-collar defense and crisis management. His move into private practice and immediate involvement in Lemon’s defense marks a swift pivot from public service to high-stakes criminal defense. wfmd.com Charges Against Lemon Lemon faces federal civil rights charges, including conspiracy and violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, for his activities at the protest. Prosecutors allege that Lemon’s presence and actions during the event contributed to the disruption of religious services and intimidation of worshippers. The FACE Act has not commonly been applied in the context of religious gatherings, making its use in this case particularly noteworthy. FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul Lemon has denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that he was acting as a journalist documenting events, not participating in them. “I went there to be a journalist,” Lemon said in previous statements, emphasizing his First Amendment rights and arguing that the charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom. The Guardian The defendant is scheduled to be arraigned on February 13 in federal court in St. Paul. Legal experts have suggested that the case could set significant precedent regarding the boundaries of journalistic activity and legal accountability when reporters cover volatile protests. The Washington Post Broader Implications The hiring of Thompson highlights broader concerns within elements of the legal community about the Justice Department’s prosecutorial priorities, particularly around immigration enforcement and civil liberties. Several former prosecutors have expressed unease about the department’s strategy, suggesting that Lemon’s case could be part of a larger pattern of federal attention on politically sensitive protests. As the case unfolds, Thompson’s insider perspective on the federal system — including knowledge of prosecutorial strategies and internal decision-making — is expected to be a valuable asset to Lemon’s defense. Observers note that Thompson’s participation could enhance Lemon’s ability to challenge the government’s legal approach and bolster arguments about constitutional protections for journalists. wfmd.com For Lemon, already a polarizing figure in media and politics, the move to bring in a former senior prosecutor underscores the seriousness of the legal battle ahead. With constitutional freedom of the press and civil liberties at the center of the dispute, the courtroom clash is likely to attract national scrutiny as one of the more closely watched legal fights of 2026.
By Fiaz Ahmed 5 days ago in The Swamp
The Saddest Thing - The Billionaires Who Rule America Aren't Even Enjoying Themselves
This single post says more about our ruling class than a thousand policy papers. The saddest thing about today's system is that the men robbing the rest of us - sabotaging our economic prospects, our pensions, our access to affordable healthcare - are not even happy.
By Scott Christenson🌴10 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.