Don Lemon Hires Federal Prosecutor Who Quit Over Immigration Crackdown

Former CNN anchor and longtime journalist Don Lemon has taken a striking new step in his legal defense by enlisting a veteran federal prosecutor who resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota amid mounting tensions over the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies and handling of high-profile investigations. The move underscores the high stakes of Lemon’s federal case, which has drawn national attention and raised questions about press freedom, prosecutorial discretion and political influence within the Justice Department.
Lemon, who now works as an independent journalist, was indicted earlier this year along with eight others for his alleged role in a January 18 protest that disrupted a Sunday service at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Federal prosecutors allege the group conspired to interfere with worship and intimidate congregants, invoking a 1994 civil rights statute typically used to protect access to reproductive health clinics but also applicable to places of worship. Lemon asserts he was present only in his journalistic capacity, livestreaming the event as part of his reporting work.
Unexpected Legal Reinforcement
In a notable twist, Lemon has added Joseph H. Thompson, a former interim U.S. Attorney for Minnesota, to his defense team. Thompson had served nearly 17 years in the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office and held senior leadership positions, including acting U.S. Attorney, before resigning in January amid internal disagreements over how federal authorities were handling immigration-related cases and certain investigations.
A court filing earlier this week confirmed that Thompson will appear as counsel of record for Lemon, joining powerhouse defense attorney Abbe Lowell in representing the journalist in federal court. Lowell is known for representing high-profile clients in politically charged cases and is expected to lead the defense strategy.
Thompson’s decision to switch sides — from federal prosecutor to defense counsel — against the very office he once helped lead adds an unusual dynamic to the case. It pits Lemon’s defense team directly against seasoned federal attorneys with whom Thompson once worked, potentially reshaping legal tactics and courtroom dynamics.
The Washington Post
Why Thompson Resigned
Thompson’s departure from the U.S. Attorney’s Office last month came amid a broader wave of resignations by senior prosecutors reportedly frustrated by directives from Justice Department leadership under the Trump administration. Several prosecutors, including Thompson and at least five colleagues, stepped down after disputes over the department’s immigration enforcement strategy and its approach to investigating the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer in Minneapolis.
The Guardian
Moody ideological differences reportedly emerged after Justice Department leaders overruled more experienced prosecutors who sought to pursue a legal inquiry into the killing of Good. Instead, the department directed focus toward other aspects of related matters, prompting Thompson and others to resign in protest, according to reporting from multiple outlets.
The Guardian
After leaving the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Thompson partnered with another former federal prosecutor, Harry Jacobs, to establish a private law firm — Thompson Jacobs PLLC — that focuses on complex litigation, white-collar defense and crisis management. His move into private practice and immediate involvement in Lemon’s defense marks a swift pivot from public service to high-stakes criminal defense.
wfmd.com
Charges Against Lemon
Lemon faces federal civil rights charges, including conspiracy and violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, for his activities at the protest. Prosecutors allege that Lemon’s presence and actions during the event contributed to the disruption of religious services and intimidation of worshippers. The FACE Act has not commonly been applied in the context of religious gatherings, making its use in this case particularly noteworthy.
FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul
Lemon has denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that he was acting as a journalist documenting events, not participating in them. “I went there to be a journalist,” Lemon said in previous statements, emphasizing his First Amendment rights and arguing that the charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom.
The Guardian
The defendant is scheduled to be arraigned on February 13 in federal court in St. Paul. Legal experts have suggested that the case could set significant precedent regarding the boundaries of journalistic activity and legal accountability when reporters cover volatile protests.
The Washington Post
Broader Implications
The hiring of Thompson highlights broader concerns within elements of the legal community about the Justice Department’s prosecutorial priorities, particularly around immigration enforcement and civil liberties. Several former prosecutors have expressed unease about the department’s strategy, suggesting that Lemon’s case could be part of a larger pattern of federal attention on politically sensitive protests.
As the case unfolds, Thompson’s insider perspective on the federal system — including knowledge of prosecutorial strategies and internal decision-making — is expected to be a valuable asset to Lemon’s defense. Observers note that Thompson’s participation could enhance Lemon’s ability to challenge the government’s legal approach and bolster arguments about constitutional protections for journalists.
wfmd.com
For Lemon, already a polarizing figure in media and politics, the move to bring in a former senior prosecutor underscores the seriousness of the legal battle ahead. With constitutional freedom of the press and civil liberties at the center of the dispute, the courtroom clash is likely to attract national scrutiny as one of the more closely watched legal fights of 2026.